![]() |
![]() |
|
|
At present, there are three main surgical routes for resection of an acoustic neuroma. These approaches are chosen based upon educational bias, surgical experience, and the specific goals of the operation.
The goals and acceptable clinical outcomes have evolved over time. Many years ago, the goal was simple debulking of the tumor (which was often large) and relief of regional brainstem compression and hydrocephalus. The goal was life saving. Neurologic deficits such as hearing loss, facial weakness, or balance disorders were tolerated as simply part of the expected result. In the 1970's, the introduction of the operating microscope facilitated meticulous dissection of the tumor so that attempts at cranial nerve preservation could be made. Over the next 20 years, preservation of facial nerve continuity became more common than not. During the 1990's, hearing preservation became an achievable goal in selected cases. At the same time, improvements in anesthetic technique and wound closure reduced the risk of cerebellar infarction, meningitis, and cerebral spinal fluid leakage. Nevertheless these problems still continue to exist and cerebral spinal fluid leakage remains a significant problem after resection (2). © 2001-06 The Department of Neurosurgery, at the University of Pittsburgh. This web site is intended for educational purposes only. The information provided through this web site should not be used for diagnosing or treating a health problem or disease. Please see your physician before taking any medical action. Do not duplicate in any form. All rights reserved. Please read full legal disclaimer and privacy policy. Please direct all web-specific inquiries to our web manager. |